In appointing Paolo Di Canio as Sunderland manager, owner
Ellis Short not only fell victim to the “Contrast Theory” but has actively
embraced it.
The theory is simple, and has its origins in time
immemorial. When replacing an
underperforming manager, simply make your next selection his polar opposite: freewheelers
replace tacticians. Teachers replace
“player’s coaches”; experience dismissed for youth that presages change e’er
longed-for.
Completely and utterly
uncontroversial is superseded by … Paolo Di Canio.
This contrast doesn’t get much more pronounced than this
week’s changeover at the helm of the Black Cats. Martin O’Neill – dear, staid, true, predictable
and downtrodden Martin O’Neill – is gone, replaced by the fiery Di Canio. For much of the season the Mackems have
appeared short of ideas: O’Neill has been chief among the bewildered as his
tried-and-tested methods shuffled his emotionless team towards relegation.
After an initial dead-cat
bounce, the old coaching methods that O’Neill had employed with success over
two decades with Wycombe, Leicester City, Celtic and Aston Villa proved
ineffectual at Sunderland. As his men
became almost entirely inoffensive, O’Neill appeared a forlorn man adhering to
tactics well past their sell-by date: defenders stop the ball, forwards shoot it
and midfielders move the ball between the two as efficiently as possible.
This theory still holds water – just, and if you squint – but,
in practicality, is often exposed by the more fluid systems now en vogue throughout the EPL.
Di Canio is everything that Martin O’Neill was not. He favours a remarkably
fit team of young, hungry players. Although
he often played 4-4-2 at Swindon Town, he enjoyed the most success after
shifting to an unorthodox formation.
He is flexible, young and hungry: three traits which hardly described O’Neill’s
Wearside tenure.
He is also unflinchingly controversial, although references to his political beliefs may be somewhat overstated.
He is also unflinchingly controversial, although references to his political beliefs may be somewhat overstated.
However, whether Di Canio’s furious affect
will work in the Premiership is still up for debate - the spectacular fallout
from another talent of the nineties, Paul Ince, after moving from League One to
the top flight ended amidst a flurry of self-styled
“Guv’nor” tactics which endeared him to neither his players, nor his employers.
Ellis Short has gambled that a controversial extrovert will
be more effective in dodging relegation than persevering with a man who
patently enjoyed only middling success.
O’Neill was an appointment tailored specifically to the situation in
which Sunderland found themselves seventeen months past; Di Canio is a man chosen
directly to address this predicament with this playing group. How that dressing-shed cadre responds is now,
quite literally, the £64 million question.
No comments:
Post a Comment