The following post is essentially a list of numbers, from which you can make what you will. It details each goalkeeper's individual performance over the course of the season - and, by extension, the performance of each club's defence over the season past.
Click past the byline to see the (rather lengthy) statistics.
Thursday, June 20, 2013
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Socceroos bound for Rio despite managerial misgivings
After cutting it far too fine for comfort, the Socceroos can finally begin to prepare for the 2014 World Cup in Brazil. An eighty-third minute headed goal from Joshua Kennedy sealed a 1-0 victory against old rivals Iraq and progression from the final round of Asian Qualifying. While the display against essentially a second-string side was hardly awe-inspiring, it was enough and the antipodeans now take their place alongside Japan, South Korea and Iran as AFC representatives at the Big Dance.
Uzbekistan and Jordan will compete in a two-legged playoff in early September for the final available Asian qualifying position. Whichever squad that makes it to Brazil will certainly prove a fillip to their nation, but may not impact the makeup of the second round: of the Asian clubs bound for Rio, Betfair.com has Japan the shortest of the long-odds at 126:1.
While it's taken nearly three years, Australia coach Holger Osieck seems to have finally hit upon the best makeup for his side. Over his tenure, Osieck has dithered through an extensive playing roster without ever tipping his hand towards pragmatism (and continued appearances by the likes of Sasa Ognenovski and Alex Brosque) or an attempt at an exciting future featuring Tomas Rogic, Tommy Oar and Robbie Kruse. This has hurt the team, as players both young and old never seem to know whether they had roles to play in attaining a World Cup berth. Had the Socceroos not won last night, this lack of clear vision - and a penchant for sexist jokes - would have thrust the German onto perilously thin ice.
The lineups deployed in these past two crucial qualifiers suggest Osieck believes - as do the majority of the Green and Gold Army - that success lies not in wholesale youth or experience, but somewhere firmly betwixt. The crucial players in Tuesday evening's win were Oar, Rogic and resurrected thirtysomethings Ognenovski, Neill, Kennedy and Mark Bresciano. Had the Socceroos been without Al-Gharafa's Bresciano over the past six months, they would be - at best - face a nerve-racking playoff to cement next summer's Samba Tour.
After two years of curious selections, it may be that Osieck has happened luckily upon his best lineup at the critical time. The alternate viewpoint states that Australia's mixed results are a function of rarely having an entire squad available due to the travel involved in representing Australia.
Educated onlookers favour the former, especially based on the teams Osieck selected during turgid losses to Jordan and a draw with Oman: the Socceroos relied too heavily upon a square, lateral gameplan that lacked in fluidity and impetus. The re-emergence of Oar and the boost Rogic and Kruse obtained from transfers has thrust a more joyful approach upon the men in gold, resulting in a 4-0 thumping of Jordan (the nation's biggest win in a match that mattered since their 6-0 thrashing of Uzbekistan in the 2011 Asian Cup) and now, ultimately, acceptance not just as the Socceroos' future, but also their present.
To paraphrase Napoleon: it's better to be lucky than good, and Osieck appears to have stumbled upon his most fruitful combination.
Despite the pressure of expectation, Osieck has recently displayed a happy recognition of when to make the correct substitutions at the most important moments. Last night, he got it right again - removing Australia's most effective forwards this decade (Tim Cahill and Brett Holman) and inserting forgotten man Kennedy - a man built to dominate Asian football - who scored only minutes after arriving on the pitch for the 'Roos for the first time since 2011
That he has finally, finally, seemingly integrated the talented youth into the cadre of hard-bitten vets and finally exemplified his once-vaunted game-management skills, the future looks brighter for Australian football than it did only a fortnight ago.
With the pressure now off and Australia hoping for an improvement from Pim Verbeek's ill-begotten 2010 World Cup.
Friday, June 14, 2013
When the going gets tough, Luis Suarez gets out
When the going gets tough, the tough get going.
Those sounds you hear emanating
from Liverpool aren’t Billy
Ocean’s 1985 hit*, but of Luis Suarez’s discontent. The going’s gotten tough – and now he wants
out.
The Liverpool forward – who came
within a suspension of claiming the 2012-13 Premier League Golden Boot – has this
week repeated
his statements that he wants to leave England due to the biased nature of the
Football Association and the pervasive English media.
Amongst
Suarez’s body of “proof” is the eight game ban levied upon him for making
racially-charged comments to Patrice Evra when “England’s own” John Terry received
a four match sanction for similar actions.
While he has a point – racial abuse is racial abuse – Luis Suarez’s situation
is entirely of his own manufacture. For
him to want out now is a disrespectful to his manager, club and supporters.
Ignoring for a moment his Dutch
ban for biting and the histrionics surrounding his World Cup Quarter Final
handball, Suarez has repeatedly shown a willingness to operate outside the spirit
of the game. This is nothing special –
you’d venture to say that most players if
presented with the opportunity would embrace an advantage – but what makes
Suarez’s case “special” is the public nature in which these incidents occur.
Luis Suarez, startling talent though
he is, behaves badly in perhaps the most public place on Earth – an English football
pitch. It is this willingness to work so
visibly outside the spirit of the game that have earned him the scrutiny he now
disdains.
Without doing the
rap sheet thing again, his recent interviews
in Uruguay have shown a remarkable ability to apply reason to recidivism. Those interviews neglect to mention, however,
that each indiscretion has been under his control, the result of his decisions.
Sometimes Suarez happens upon a
point of some reason – in this case that the footballing public has been unable
to judge him solely on his footballing ability.
This of course is true, but simply because the player has made a judgment
of independent football talent impossible because of the circus of malfeasance in
which he so readily engages. After three
years of constant, tiring uproar, there is now no separation between his play and
his on-field persona, warts and all.
Throughout his time on
Merseyside, the Kop – and his managers – have supported him. He has become one of the league’s best
players and one of its handful of truly influential players. For him to want out – ostensibly
to Real Madrid – after having such a large and vocal supporter base back
him so often reflects very poorly on him.
When faced with a sticky
situation of our own design, few in life have the option to bolt and therefore
we must live with our decisions. Most realize
that if our actions put us into awkward circumstance, we must make the best of
it: either to make it right, or to cope (and hopefully flourish) from prior
choices. For that to happen though, there
must be an awareness of how one arrives at their current position – discernment
Luis Suarez apparently lacks.
*I will take any excuse to link to a Billy Ocean music video.
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Summer's transfer "saga" candidates
Each year, one player’s future
whereabouts overshadows the impending destinations of all others. Over the years, that player has been Dimitar
Berbatov, Carlos Tevez, Cesc Fabregas and Robin
van Persie; each of whom left the club at which they made their name for pastures
and challenges new. It’s time to run our
eye over the candidates for this year’s edition of “Summer’s Biggest Transfer”.
Candidate 1: Wayne Rooney
Most interested: Paris Saint-Germain, Arsenal
Rooney has
all but stated publicly that he wants a change after nine years at Old
Trafford, and most Manchester United fans want to usher him towards the door. Since a breakout 2009-10, a player known for
work rate and invention has stagnated and as a consequence has lost his pre-eminent
position in English football. Markets such as bwinbetting.com have Rooney at short odds to remain at United, but there has been rumoured interest from big-spenders PSG and also from the gleam in Arsene Wenger's eye.
A change of scenery might
be the answer both for player and club. Although United’s recent
history is filled with “lifers”, there have also been a fair share of those who
trudged off down washout lane. The fact
is that Rooney is a surplus player at United, especially if new manager David
Moyes is allowed to thrust a fistfuls at a new striker and/or central midfielder. It may well be time to go, but
his past two years and astonishing wages may make a deal difficult.
Candidate 2: Robert Lewandowski
Most interested: Bayern Munich, Manchester United
Lewandowski might be the best
footballing centre-forward in Europe. He
has languorous pace, scores in hatfuls and can play any style of game. However, he earns approximately €20,000 per
week at Borussia Dortmund and is ready for a well-earned payday that Dortmund
can’t offer.
Enter – as per usual – Bayern Munich. The Bavarians boast a remarkable
treble-winning squad who look eminently capable of creating the next great club
dynasty, reinforced
by taking Dortmund’s most prize talent, Mario Götze. There is little doubt that Lewandowski will
move; the issue is simply where.
While Real Madrid have been
mentioned, the two most likely destinations are Bayern Munich and Manchester
United. However, with David Moyes’ transfer
habits – necessarily – tending towards deadline deals, if Lewandowski doesn’t
sign at Bayern by July, expect this one to run and run.
Candidate 3: Gareth Bale
Most interested: Real Madrid, Manchester United
Not only is Bale the single-most
damaging player in England, but the Welshman also made himself infinitely more
valuable this year by
adapting to a more central role for Tottenham Hotspur. The likelihood is that he will move – if not
this year, then next – as Spurs’ chairman Daniel Levy enthusiastically embraces
the philosophy that “every player has his price” (see: Modric, Luka; Berbatov,
Dimitar; Keane, Robbie; amongst many others).
The debate now is whether or not
Bale thinks it best to leave White Hart Lane in 2013 or perhaps to hang around
a year for another crack at Champions League qualification. Real Madrid obviously thinks that he looks
good in white, while he might form the most devastating offense in the
Premiership should he join Manchester United.
It’s thought, however, that there
is a mutual
affection between Bale and Los Merengues. However, he also seems a relatively grounded
sort and as a result may become that rare player to value loyalty over money
(at least temporarily). Levy is another management-type
for whom the deadline holds no fear, so the smart money says that Bale stays a
Spur – for now.
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Jose Mourinho obeys laws of physics, leaves Real Madrid
The second law of
thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated
system never decreases, because they spontaneously evolve towards thermodynamic
equilibrium — that is, maximum entropy.
Entropy – defined as the tendency
of a system to break into terminal disorder – is such a potent force that it will
(probably) be the cause of the ultimate end of the universe, as heat is unable
to escape the system and gradually rises to such a point that everything falls
apart – literally.
In related news, José
Mourinho is again a free man. He
leaves Real Madrid after three years’ not only obeying the second law of
thermodynamics but actively seeking to hasten its work. In that time he was first feted as savior; now
he has been gratefully cast to scattering winds.
It is Mourinho’s modus operandi to close
ranks and build a combative team infused utterly with an “us against the world”
mentality that maintains a player’s confidence in himself, his manager and his
teammates. In such a way, he inspired
Porto and Inter Milan to Champions League triumphs and redressed imbalances wrought
in England and Spain by iconic teams like the Invincibles and Guardiola’s
Barcelona. To look at a squad
coached by José Mourinho – in his first two years at a club, anyway – is to see
a completely unified front and spectacular results.
However, isolation so desired creates
the closed system in which the reaction byproducts remain, increasing interior temperature
until relationships break down and instability ensues. Often his ability to rock a boat is so
profound that it affects not only him and his club but the
managers succeeding him.
Not only did Mourinho fashion this
closed system, but also the reactions ramping up the entropy within. He has engaged in running battles with the
Spanish media and cast doubt upon his own future at every opportunity; his
reputation for wanderlust has been affirmed by short, but successful, spells at
four clubs in a decade (and
another coming). The intensity with
which he achieves such great results also serves as a constant abrasive as his
cocksure manner shuffles relationships inexorably from “we” to “me”.
Until José Mourinho learns to
temper his double-edged intensity, his tenures will always be short – indeed,
it was this tendency that forestalled interest
in him from Manchester United, a position he so obviously covets. However, because the results he generates are
so compelling, there will be no shortage of suitors hoping to take advantage of
his remarkable talent.
Friday, May 17, 2013
Farewell, David Beckham, and thanks
David Beckham has
retired from professional football at the age of 38. The former England captain and fashion icon leaves
the game a ten-time league champion in twenty seasons – winning six titles with
Manchester United, two with Los Angeles Galaxy and one each with Real Madrid
and Paris Saint-Germain.
He will be remembered for a great many things – scoring from midfield to announce his arrival, romancing a Spice Girl and transcending his sport more than any other footballer. In some ways it’s a pity that his global fame has overshadowed his formidable footballing ability, for he was a truly outstanding midfielder for Man U. He was absolutely brilliant with his dead-ball delivery and could deliver a Hollywood assist better than anyone of his generation outside retirement companion Paul Scholes.
A cross from David Beckham? On time, every time.
He will go down as the defining player of his generation, a name for the ages carrying greater widespread appeal than those who accomplished more on the field like former teammates Ryan Giggs, Raul and Andrea Pirlo. The names forever linked with football from the late 90s and early 2000s will begin with David Beckham.
![]() |
| (c) Balanced Sports - from author's own collection |
Beckham’s singular talent wasn’t for football or a particular skill within it, but an immense charisma that saw everyone seek his approval (aside from one or two particular managers). So powerful was the impression left by his simple and dignified affect that he belongs in the Athletic Charisma Hall of Fame alongside the likes of Michael Jordan and founder member Muhammad Ali. While these two boasted a more primal and combative magnetism, Beckham’s appeal is based around a graceful and understated – almost minimalist – style.
The other skill that David Beckham perfected was an ability to make money. This is inextricably linked to his other singular asset: his bearing created a demand that expanded his pocketbook exponentially. It’s hard to rationalize an athlete making the lucrative money he has, and even harder to justify. However, considering the amount of rabid publicity he and his family endured, he deserved every penny. Even in his last season, he earned £30 million – including a rich contract for a dozen appearance from PSG’s bench that only further heightened his public appeal.
He leaves the game with as much class as he entered it. When a young David Beckham sent a 45-yard ball floating past Wimbledon ‘keeper Neil Sullivan, the football world opened up to him and anything seemed possible. Now, as he now walks into a much larger world, the same could be said again.
Anything is possible.
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Rooney dumps himself into dilemma
We all remember the last time
Wayne Rooney wanted out. Or
at least, we should. In October of
2010, his agent Paul Stretford claimed the nascent twenty five year-old was
frustrated with a lack of progress at Old Trafford and that he wanted to
compete for trophies he felt were beyond United’s reach.
After two days of death-threats
and punditry reliant upon the word “entitlement”, Sir Alex Ferguson and Rooney
emerged two days later and announced the forward had signed a new deal – for
five years- which would make him the highest-paid
Red Devil of all time. The venerable
gaffer had spent the previous two days displaying all the hallmarks of a master
of amateur cod-psychology, effectively reversing the gun barrel pointed at the
club and pointing it squarely at a player never looked upon by “the faithful”
in the same way since.
Two and a half years later, we
find history repeats itself as the player most associated with Sir Alex
Ferguson’s final handful of great Manchester United teams was left out of the
manager’s farewell appearance at Old Trafford.
The manager himself confirmed – on a day that should have been about
him, not anyone else – that Rooney had asked out. Current
betting markets like Unibet have Bayern Munich favoured to land the most talented
English player of his generation, followed by Paris Saint-Germain and Chelsea.
However, the equation might not
be so simple. As a result both of form
and also that abysmally-mismanaged game of one-upmanship, Rooney finds himself with
few options. While rumour suggests he
prefers a transfer to Bayern Munich, would this year’s Champions League
finalists want him – especially with a new manager entering and whispers
of Neymar on the way?
At Chelsea, he would be a
lumbering throwback at no. 10 and a retrograde step from the scampering dervishes
now en vogue forward of centre at
Stamford Bridge. Even as a designated
poacher, his appeal decreases: while cash isn’t necessarily an object for
either Roman Abramovich or the Qatari Sports Group, Financial
Fair Play certainly is.
Rooney’s predicament is an
absolute function of on- and off-field form.
Since his cumbersome double-bluff was called in late 2010, the club’s
former talisman has performed only irregularly on the pitch, which has resulted
in Ferguson preferring United’s other forward options in the season’s biggest
games.
This is multiplied by the lack of
esteem in which he – the person, rather than the player – is held by Manchester
United’s fans. His continual lack of
foresight has seen him maneuver himself into an awkward position - unlike 2010,
he appears to genuinely want to leave Manchester, yet the contract he “won” at
that time and patchy form hardly endears him to Europe’s top clubs. Rather than accept a lauded position as the
definitive Red Devil of the early part of this century, his myopia has led him now
to almost certainly ending his career at Old Trafford an unfulfilled great.
Wayne Rooney’s lack of vision has
made a very stiff rod for his own back.
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Farewell Sir Alex Ferguson
It was unexpected, quick and most
suitable.
Sir Alex Ferguson didn’t need a
cavalcade of fanfare as he announced
his retirement today after twenty-seven years as manager of Manchester
United, but a simple celebration befitting an uncomplicated man. Rather than engendering endless speculation by
pre-empting his retirement or embarking upon a final series of signature mind
games, Sir Alex has chosen a dignified departure.
Though it has emerged that
Everton’s David
Moyes will almost certainly take over as the Red Devils’ boss – a move marked
clearly with Sir Alex’s fingerprints – today isn’t a day to fete the new, but to
remember the older – a man who was quite simply the best. Despite battles lost, the war was an
overwhelming triumph choreographed by a director gifted so supremely with vision,
flexibility of thought and strength of character.
These adjectives will be three of
the thousands used to describe him today, such is his renown and ability. He is the defining character in the history
of the English Premier League, a league which owes its popularity in large part
to the
inexorable United sides that accumulated thirteen titles from twenty-one.
It’s odd to think that perhaps
his greatest strength was that flexibility.
Over his tenure, Sir Alex earned a reputation for uncompromising forthrightness,
a character trait that hardly suggests a man given to adaptability. However, his pile-driving outward manner masked
a communicator not only able to relate effectively to players born across six
decades, but to spur – or cajole – whatever greatness lay within. The sport bears little resemblance to the one
he himself played north of the Wall; the circus surrounding it even less, but
he has been ever-present – a man defying time and tempering.
His longevity pays ultimate tribute
to a
pragmatic tactical flexibility. Over
the course of his reign, Sir Alex has not only replenished United’s stocks but also
regenerated from within. The most recent
revival saw the dour Champions of 2011 moulded into a collection of title-winning
freewheelers. Neither was “vintage”,
but both were utterly effective.
Sir Alex Ferguson’s legacy will
include two Champions League wins, thirteen Premiership titles (and sixteen overall),
a European Cup Winners’ Cup and five FA Cups.
It is inconceivable in the disposable culture of today’s football that
these accomplishments could be surpassed by one man and a team crafted, refined
and re-refined.
However, it is unfair that he will
be measured by quantifiable achievements. The past twenty-seven years have been his greatest
bequest: the
Fledglings, a magical evening at the Nou Camp and an inherent confidence
that triumph lay only ninety minutes away.
None are more impressive than the
figures who dominate our formative years; they linger in memory having immortalized
deeds never to be surpassed. Sir Alex Ferguson is the only
manager that most living Manchester United – and football – fans have ever
known. For anyone aged under
thirty-five, he will forever prowl the sidelines at Old Trafford as his bronzed
likeness glares down from a pedestal fronting Old Trafford’s entry gates. Flickering shadows will replace him, some of
whom will succeed. But none will match the deeds, or be
remembered as fondly, as Sir Alex Ferguson.
Thursday, May 2, 2013
MLS and Manchester City a good match
With MLS seeking again to swell
its ranks, the discussion has seemingly moved from where the next franchise
will be located – New York City – and onto whom is best positioned to own and
run such an enterprise.
It has emerged that Manchester
City’s flush-with owners are
interested in soldering together this prometheus, appropriately based in the
borough of Flushing. The new team would
serve twin purposes of generating talent for its parent club and increasing
City’s brand recognition in the ever-expanding US market.
City’s expansion into the US
market seems to have been received positively by fans of MLS as well as Don
Garber, as well it should. The league
was recently judged the seventh-most
attended on the planet, as has begun regularly producing players of true quality
and an open gateway to Europe could provide more exposure in a nation where
football highlights rarely make Sportscenter.
Close ties between are
commonplace within countries, or continents even - Manchester United have had a
longstanding relationship with Belgian club Royal Antwerp. More recently – and perhaps more similarly as
well – the Pozzo family has expanded from their black-and-white binding fiefdoms
at Udinese to
annex clubs in Spain and England, using them to develop players that they
can then either use or sell, usually with a significant sticker
price increase.
Any concerns MLS fans have about being home to “feeder”
clubs can be assuaged by investigating the benefits of and exposure that having
Sheikh Mansour involved in American sport would
deliver.
Setting up an expansion
franchise, youth academy and building a stadium in the real-estate mire of NYC
will cost a bucketful. Such hard costs
coupled with the expense of bringing in players might intimidate a new
ownership group and delay fan aggregation – we all love a winner. Not only would the New York Blues have the
opportunity to raid
the Sky Blues for loan players, but also the backing to deliver some of the
country’s most promising young talent. They
have more money to spend at chiseling out market share than could possibly be
needed, no small feat in the City that Never Sleeps.
And perhaps the greatest
benefit of all might come from the increased visibility. The popularity of the English game transcends
that of all other major leagues (with the exception of two notable Spanish
clubs) and the Citizens’ five-year spending spree has ensured their position at
that league’s apex until their patriarch suffers from a case of terminal
boredom.
Links with a league as outgoing
as the English Premiership should be actively encouraged.
It is a fundamental truth of
business that if a superwealthy investor shows interest in your product, you’re
doing something very right or very wrong.
Another reality is that you generally look to involve these
multi-multi-multi-billionaires wherever possible, as long as it doesn’t put you
out too much – having capital in the bank never hurts. The continued growth of MLS suggests that
Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al Nahyan’s interest isn’t hostile; if the feelers he
is putting out are genuine, rest assured that Garber et al will move heaven and
earth to make him a part of the league.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

