Proboxing-fans.com's lexicon
of pugilistic nomenclature defines a “Puncher's Chance” as
“[a fighter] who doesn't have a very good chance of beating the
other fighter, who is probably more skilled, but could still pull off
the win by landing a great punch and knocking his man out”.
Basically, a puncher's chance is what
it says on the tin. It was the concept that defined all six Rocky
movies (particularly the last) and underlies any sporting contest
where one party
is heavily favoured. This is never more true than in tournament
football, where a 'keeper can get hot or a fluke deflection can win –
or lose – a match or even a trophy.
As World
Cup qualifying gears up, we're faced once again with the old
chestnut of competitive balance in European football. This was
brought to a head last week when big-name team England were pitted
against San Marino in UEFA Group 8 qualifying. Predictably, the
Three Lions put five past a team featuring
a pair of brothers who run a moving company.
And, once again we're faced
with calls to make principalities like San Marino, the Faroe
Islands, Liechtenstein and Andorra undertake pre-qualifying in order
just to get a puncher's chance. This doesn't just apply to Europe
but also to several small nations in Oceania (perhaps finally
consigning Archie Thompson's dubious
International goalscoring record to the footnotes of history).
Yes, watching teams drubbed 31-0 may be
boring; however, allowing teams that puncher's chance – no matter
how infinitesimally small it is – is also the right decision.
Sometimes you have to endure humdrum
sport because it's the right thing to do – just think of baseball's
regular season. Football truly is the world's game and as a result
it behoves FIFA to ensure the World Cup is equally accessible to all
countries. For many players – home-leaguers, removalists and soda
salesmen – a matchup with Steven Gerrard and Ashley Cole will
probably represent the highlight of their career.
With each added qualifying game, the
puncher's chance decreases. How often can lightning strike?
Sport has become more and more
streamlined over the past two decades, football especially so: the
past twenty years have seen both the European Cup and UEFA Cup
re-organised and rebranded into money-spinning leagues. Were the
same to occur at the International level, not only is the park
footballer robbed of his moment, but any chance
of upset – or even unexpected challenge – is automatically
gainsayed.
For a sport so openly seeking
egalitarianism (the one defensible reason for the Blatter regime's
failure to implement goal-line technology is/was a desire for the
sport at the park to played in almost exactly the same way as the
World Cup Final), offering everyone the same opportunity is the
fairest only way forward.
It's hardly like the lack of
competition damages the sport. In contrast, it's likely to inspire
youth who on one magical evening got to see a spectacular Wayne
Rooney free kick and returns home to practice and improve. That teen
could become Rooney mark II; he could also coach his local junior
side.
American Samoa has only the remotest
puncher's chance of defeating New Zealand in a home-and-home matchup.
But they still deserve the opportunity.
No comments:
Post a Comment