Click to enlarge |
When he thrust his spikes into Alex
Song's knee, popular opinion finally and perhaps definitively swung
against Mario Balotelli. The Italy forward leapt into numerous
dangerous challenges during Manchester City's weekend
loss to Arsenal and finished the match copping a pointless red
card in the tie's waning minutes. He arrived in the sheds to a power
of criticism flung from all corners of the football world.
Indeed, the collective noun for public
comment on the excesses of football should now be known as a
Balotelli of criticism. Furthermore, the amount of public and
unsolicited comments could then be measured on the “Balotelli
scale”, where Luka
Modric asking not to play earns one Mario; Tevez
leaving the bench merits four. When someone – probably Tevez –
eventually tops the scale's theoretical maximum of five Marios, the
internet implodes as if heaved past the event horizon.
The latest Balotelli farce probably
earns the player a two-Mario rating. Sure, it was only a compound of
(at best) dangerously laissez-faire and
(at worst) malicious challenges and an unnecessary/overdue
red card; however, it has generated scorn apparently from the ether.
While this last escapade has been a
long time coming, it becomes evermore apparent that Mario
Balotelli has the godlike ability to create from nothing.
The problem is with Balotelli. It
always has
been. The greatest change has not come from him or his
surrounding crew of enablers, but the situation in which his
antisocial behaviours have been emphasised.
Earlier this season as his hijinks
became more
playful and less
embarrassing, footballing hoi-polloi and aristocracy alike fell
head-over for him, even beginning to invite and mythologise his crazy
ventures. He became one of the most popular footballers in England,
including being the feature of a ninety-minute
BBC Radio special (with the deceased Robert Enke, the only
footballer to earn such individual discussion on radio 5Live's Sport
Special podcast stream). Mario Balotelli wasn't just tolerated, as
he was during his first jolting season in England, but appreciated.
Then City stopped winning. And
everything changed.
You can plot social reaction to
Balotelli quite easily – it follows a sin curve, ululating steadily
as mass perception of him swings from charming, innocent savant to
daemonic avatar. Certain key incidents both fuel the perpetual
transition and troll the waters of public comment. The limpid furore
provoked by these most recent indiscretions, though minor in
isolation, follow a “What the?” moment where he interrupted an
Inter Milan press conference and indicate Balotelli approaches the
curve's nadir.
Most striking about this oscillation is
how closely it mirrors expectation and performance. Each occasion
the graph turns to the negative, expectations for Balotelli or his
club become unsustainable. As the descent towards Sunday's
impropriety began, his actions were thought not antisocial but
eccentric and he was scoring regularly for the runaway league
leaders. With each loss, red card and press-conference
greeting (by the way, this was only the second-most
awkward sporting presser last week) tolerance for possible
manifestations of low-grade emotional disorder was further eroded .
No comments:
Post a Comment