Simon
Katich announced his retirement from First Class cricket earlier
this week, ending a career that began when Mark Taylor and Paul
Keating occupied the most coveted offices in the country. He leaves
with a reputation as a hardworking player who moved up the order as
his career progressed, starting at six and finishing facing the new
pill.
Katich also leaves with a reputation
for spirit; something which would surprise those who watched his Test
debut during the 2001 Ashes series. Apart from his crablike wander
across the stumps in playing each delivery, the most recognisable
incidents from a long and quite distinguished career involve his
2009 bust-up with Michael “Bingle” Clarke in the sheds and
his press
conference last year, where he said what others dared not upon
his axing from the Cricket Australia contract list.
Were he still opening the Australian
innings with Shane Watson or David Warner, it's doubtable Katich
would have retired. He felt he still had more to offer the
Australian team and his
stats backed him up. Western Australia certainly thought he had something left, as they wanted him to play 2012-13 for the Warriors. The pay's also pretty good.
Courtesy: crickblog.com |
Ricky
Ponting and Michael Hussey fight the same battle every time they
step onto the field. Both are older than Katich and appear near the
end, but have no firm plans for retirement. When either fails, a
gestalt Salomé
appears, composed of a collective press, who screams persistent
nonsense about ageing heads on salvers. The promise of youth is
decried, a glorious future is prophesied – without admission that
promise is all many Australian youngsters have to offer.
In
a world culture where stardom starts early and young is better,
Australia's sporting hierarchy leads the world. Since the country's
failure at the 1976 Montreal Olympics, Australia has prided itself on
world's best youth development; in cricket, this has manifested in
the once-vaunted Australian Cricket Academy, an offshoot of the
Australian Institute of Sport.
In
Aussie Rules football, the dominant sport, the average age of last
year's Premiers, Geelong, was 26.6 years old and considered almost
supremely old. The year before, the average age of the Collingwood's
Premiership side was 24. This led the expansion Gold Coast Suns to
select a squad with average age of just 21.2 years last term.
Players are often given only one chance and if renewal is required,
players at age 24-26 are the first to go. Precious few delisted
players are later re-drafted; an anonymous teen's promise now
supersedes proven capabilities of the known foot soldier.
The
trend has begun to reverse somewhat as veteran players like James
Podsiadly and Orren Stephenson are drafted for short-term impact and
clubs countenance that there is life in the lower leagues past the
age of 21, but this psychologically-straitjacketing desire for youth still prevails.
Australian
football clubs have cottoned on that fans want one of two things:
wins, or hope for the future. If you aren't challenging for the
title, you regenerate the entire playing list on the back of high
draft picks and hard work. Players emerge to stardom early, destroy
their bodies and retire to the paddock of fond memories by age 31.
With the success of young teams like Hawthorn and Essendon, the
Australian public is prepared to sacrifice mid-term results –
wholesale – in the ostensible guise of long-term progress.
This
simply doesn't work on the cricket field. The best players should
represent their country until their position becomes untenable. Due
to the persistent averageness displayed by Phil “Snicker” Hughes,
Usman Khawaja, Chris
Lynn et al., Katich, Hussey and Ponting should have been left to
judge themselves. Creating space for young players to grow is a
ridiculous argument – if the players can't dominate the Shield,
there's little or no reason to suggest they will perform consistently
at Test level. Adam Gilchrist, Justin Langer and Glenn McGrath
called time at the right moment – why should we treat Hussey and
Ponting any different? Plus, although the dollars on offer cloud the
decision, who
else is better to judge?
Some
athletes pick the correct time to go, while others hang on too long –
here, cricketers could take a lesson from AFL players – but to
simply remove Katich from national contention was ill-advised and
affronting. At worst, a perilous drop in form deserves the
oft-cited “tap on the shoulder”; Katich didn't receive even this
much dignity in June 2011.
At
least on Monday, his announcement carried a nobility not afforded by
his former employers.
No comments:
Post a Comment